The Great Author Photo Debate of 2015

It was a Sunday night. I’d spent 2 hours editing and cropping possible author photos, and I had 6 that I liked. And honestly, I hadn’t the least idea of which photo I should use–I was too close to the project, sick of staring at my own teeth.

So I decided to crowd source.

On Monday morning, I posted the following to Facebook. My husband reposted it to his page and to Twitter.

The Great Author Photo Debate of 2015

Responses poured in, and since I’d posted it as Public, plenty of people I’ve never met voted. And everyone had opinions. I compiled the results in an Excel file.

217 people voted. 64 people (29%) voted for more than one photo.

The final votes:

The Great Author Photo Debate of 2015: Final Votes

But despite the votes, I still wasn’t sure which photo to choose.

After all, I never said I would choose the photo that had the most votes. And photos 4 and 5 had a close number of votes, with some things making me lean towards photo 5 (several editors from a publishing house and someone who arranges author visits both put photo 5 down as their top choice). Also, it wasn’t the best poll from a scientific standpoint, as people could see what others had voted and it may have subconsciously impacted some people’s decision. (I intentionally didn’t do an official Facebook Poll, because then people could constantly see the final count, instead of just what the last few people had voted.)

In a helpful move, one of my friends gave me some pop culture advice.

He told me “Blue Steel.”

Oh, yes, from the film Zoolander. Is it really possible to choose the best Ben Stiller, especially since the photos are so drastically different?

Blue Steel

Also, he sent me this amazing clip from the film Ten Things I Hate About You. You can skip to about 36 seconds in.

The real question, then, is if I wanted to be pensive or thoughtful.

As many people pointed out, different photos create different meanings, and impact the way people will interpret me as an author. But there was a diversity of interpretations for any given photo.

I decided to do a test and see what the photos looked like on the web.

I turned to Twitter, since I have a small audience and followers don’t get a notification when you switch your photo.

Photo 4 on Twitter:

Image_4_on_Twitter

And when it’s shown smaller:

Image_4_on_Twitter_Small

Photo 5 on Twitter:

Image_5_on_Twitter

And when it’s shown smaller:

Image_5_on_Twitter_Small

Both photos looked good on Twitter. But in the context of a social media site, I preferred Photo 4.

Katherine Cowley Author Photo

So despite the fact that I am going to make 47% of respondents unhappy, I’m going with Photo 4. However, I plan to use Photo 5 if I ever need an alternate photo.

My other photos are awesome too. For instance, the turquoise background photos look really good when they aren’t cropped into a headshot, so I will surely use them for something.

Thanks to everyone who participated in the Great Author Photo Debate of 2015!

 

The Question of the Meeting of the Myths Contest and the Mormon Lit Blitz

I have a short story which will be published on the final day of the Meeting of the Myths contest, currently being held by the Mormon Lit Blitz, and as a result I’ve been thinking about the purpose of the contest. In the introductory essay to all the stories, Nicole and James Goldberg explain that a myth is “a story which humans use to make meaning out of existence.” These myths, whether fact or fiction, determine the way we see the world. The contest “asked writers to take some of the myths that fill their worlds and mix them together into new stories to give us new chances at insight.”

But can different myths be mixed? Is it healthy? Is it wise?

2 - Save the CatIn Blake Snyder’s famous writing textbook Save the Cat, Blake Snyder criticizes M. Night Shyamalan’s film Signs for being guilty of what he calls Double Mumbo Jumbo.

In M. Night Shyamalan’s Signs, we are asked to believe that aliens from outer space have invaded Earth. The movie is about Mel Gibson’s crisis of faith in God. Huh?! I’d say proof of an alien intelligence outside our solar system sorta trumps all discussion about faith in God, don’t you think? But M. asks us to juggle both. And it’s a mess. Well, God and aliens don’t mix. Why? Because it’s two sets of different kinds of magic. It’s Double Mumbo Jumbo.

Snyder summarizes:

Audiences will only accept one piece of magic per movie. It’s The Law. You cannot see aliens from outer space land in a UFO and then be bitten by a vampire and now be both aliens and undead.

I admit, an alien-vampire-zombie mix-up does sound like a bit too much for one story. They are each distinct beings–but even more, they each demand their own genre. A good alien movie or vampire movie or zombie movie can take chapters to set up the world building and the rules of the storytelling. And the Double Mumbo Jumbo that occurs when you put them together does seem well worth avoiding.

But back to Snyder’s example, Signs. I actually thoroughly enjoyed the movie. For me, God exists, so I don’t have to suspend any disbelief for that myth or mythos. And I believe aliens could theoretically exist, so the fact that a main character could have a faith crisis concurrently to fighting off aliens seems reasonable to me, and in fact the threat of the aliens helps the character through the faith crisis, and creates several beautiful moments of discovery for the reader.

Yet in other stories, having God and a magic system has created cognitive dissonance for me, and seems like it has a greater risk of damaging faith than promoting it. For example, there are stories all about God and the Easter Bunny, which weave them together for children. Well, the Easter Bunny is not real (sorry, folks) and yet if we connect the Easter Bunny and God, and one is false, couldn’t we just assume the other is a figment of the imagination as well?

From an LDS gospel standpoint, there is also the sense that we must leave our other idols, our other sources of meaning behind, and devote ourselves entirely to God. As it says in Matthew 6:24, “No man can serve two masters.” What then of the Meeting of the Myths contest? Wouldn’t it be better just to leave those other myths behind?

And yet we have other commandments as well. In Doctrine and Covenants 88:118 it says, “seek ye out of the best books words of wisdom.” The best books come from people all across the world and time, of all faiths. And in the Thirteenth Article of Faith we read, “If there is anything virtuous, lovely, or of good report or praiseworthy, we seek after these things.”

There is much that is virtuous and lovely and praiseworthy in popular music, in science fiction, in Hindu poetry, and in the traditions and mythologies of every nation and country. And we should not just tolerate these other perspectives and ideas: we should seek after them.

Perhaps there is a balance. Perhaps we can fix our hearts on God, knowing He is the source of all truth, while gaining knowledge and insight and understanding and beauty from a variety of sources.

I suspect, when I read the stories of the Meeting of the Myths contest, I will have some cognitive dissonance, where I find Double Mumbo Jumbo at play–and I suspect that will be intentional on the part of the writers. I’m sure that some myths will act as foils for each other, while others will complement, while others will build upon each other. The editors of the contest write:  “If you join us this week, you will read about tribal shamans and world councils, about zombies and vampires and aliens, about the enchanted ones with the blessings and burdens they carry, about Mormon pioneers in 19th century America and modern Brazil.” If stories from previous Mormon Lit Blitz contests are any indication, I will laugh, I will cry, I will question, and ultimately I will leave the reading experience feeling a little stronger and a little more confident on my path back to God.

I hope that you visit the Mormon Lit Blitz and read each of the seven stories (including mine, “Daughter of a Boto”). Only then will you have a decisive answer on what happens when myths are mixed.
Meeting of the MythsOriginal image by harold.lloyd, Creative Commons license, adapted by Katherine Cowley.

Talk Like Jane Austen Day: October 30th, 2013

Talk Like Jane Austen Day Freebie

This is my first Talk Like Jane Austen Day. And I think I’m ready for it. 

Copy of the complete works of Jane Austen? Check.

Love for old, big words and talking in formal, complex sentences? Check.

Excited to go fangirl on an author who has been dead for almost 200 years? Check.

Liked the Talk Like Jane Austen Day Facebook page? Check. 

I could not resist, and I even put together a list of 5 tips for Talk Like Jane Austen Day:

Talk Like Jane Austen Day Button

Admit it, Talk Like Jane Austen Day is at least as cool as Talk Like a Pirate Day. And there are just as many fun, Jane Austen films to watch as there are pirate films.

Also, my Ignite Phoenix presentation on Jane Austen and Argument (or in other words, how to talk like Jane Austen) is now live on youtube. Conveniently, you can also watch it here:

Have an amazing Jane Austen-inspired holiday. Maybe your boss will even let you take the day off.

Ignite Phoenix, Austenland Review, and General Austenness

Today’s post is on all things Jane Austen. First, my Ignite Phoenix presentation, second, a bunch of Jane Austen pages I added to my website, and third, an Austenland review.

Ignite Phoenix

Friday, October 18th, I’m presenting at Ignite Phoenix on Pride and Prejudice: Jane Austen and the Art of Argument. There are presentations on everything from race car driving to NASA launches to hitchhiking–it’ll be a few hours of action-packed, 5-minute presentations. If you weren’t able to get tickets (or don’t live in Phoenix) you can watch the livestream (details here). It starts at 6:30 p.m. in Arizona (same time as California, for the moment).

Have I mentioned that I’m excited? Or that I made amazing bookmarks to hand out at the After Party?

Jane Austen Bookmarks

New Website Section: Jane Austenness

I went a little crazy and decided to create a bunch of new pages for my website, all about Jane Austen love. You know you want to read them:

Talk Like Jane Austen Day Button Jane Austen Fandom, Statues, and Websites ButtonGet the Books Button Argument in Pride and Prejudice Button

Austenland Review

Austenland

Have you ever wished you could just step in one of your favorite books and live there for a while? That’s the premise of Austenland–a thirty something single woman decides to spend her whole savings to go to an Austen theme park, where she gets to dress and act like a Jane Austen character for a several week period. This is a hilarious film on love, literature, and finding happiness wherever you are. I could not stop laughing, and I really want to see this movie again soon.

Anyone who likes Jane Austen loves this movie. To my family: I want a DVD copy as soon as it comes out–it would make a great gift, hint, hint.

Austenland was an independent film, made on a small budget (though you can’t tell from the film itself) and after premiering at Sundance Film Festival it was picked up by Sony. As such, it’s had a limited theatrical release, but it’s still playing in theaters across the US, and if you like Jane Austen, it’s worth a 20 or 30 minute drive to see. Google Austenland for showtimes near you or visit this website.

Writing Inspirations: “In Which Eve Names Everything Else”

My mini-play/story, “In Which Eve Names Everything Else,” recently won 2nd place in the 2013 Mormon Lit Blitz contest. (If you’re interested, you can also read the discussion of my play.)

The stories that I write are often inspired by a strange combination of things that I’ve been interacting with. Sometimes I have no idea what those inspirations are; other times it’s quite clear. For this story, I can trace four direct influences:

1. A Barenaked Ladies song

barenaked ladies

The day before writing the story I was listening to “A Word for That” on Toddler Radio. Here’s the opening lyrics of the song:

There’s a word for that
But I don’t seem to know it
Sometimes I grow a mustache
Just so I don’t have to show it

The word for that
That someone somewhere chose
For that little dented skin
Between my upper lip and nose

There’s a word for that
What does it start with, the word for that?
I’d sound so smart if I only knew
The word for that, perhaps you do

The word you’re looking for is philtrum

If you’ve short story, it’s pretty clear how the song impacted my ideas.

2. The History of Science

Francis BaconOver the past few years I’ve been reading lots of articles or books on the history of science. And in one of those texts (or perhaps several of them) it mentioned that alchemists used new words to obscure things, make them more mystical and less understandable, but in the “new science” of the Enlightenment, people like Bacon used new words to make things clearer.

For several months I had been thinking about how you need a word for something if it becomes an object of study in and of itself.

3. A Book on Writing Scenes

Crafting ScenesJust a few days before writing the play, I finished reading an excellent book, The Novelist’s Essential Guide to Crafting Scenes. I honestly had never thought about the scene as a unit before reading this book, and thinking about what a scene has to do really influenced the style in which I wrote the mini-scenes in my play (one of which is only two lines long, yet I feel is a complete scene).

4. A college class from my undergrad years

Paradise Painting by Lucas CranachBack in 2007 I took a Humanities capstone course, “The Eden Theme in Western Culture.” We read all sorts of Adam and Eve stories, and looked at how the Eden them influenced exploration, gardening, religion, and even film. This ideas sunk into me, and have forever changed the way I see Adam and Eve.

After my story was published, a reader pointed out that Mark Twain also wrote a humorous story about Adam and Eve naming things. I’d never heard of it before writing my play, but having read it, I can say there are some similarities, though Twain’s is much longer and much less reverent. (Twain actually wrote a whole set of Adam and Eve works. The one I just read is called “Extracts from Adam’s Diary.” I still need to read “Eve’s Diary,” which looks like it has amazing illustrations.)

On Writing the Play

I have never written the play before. I composed the first half, basically word for word, while I was in the shower. It was a long shower. I came out and transcribed it in between feeding kids, and wrote the rest that day.

A trusted reader gave me back a short set of revision notes. I submitted it to the 2013 Mormon Lit Blitz contest. It was chosen as one of 11 finalists from about 200 entries. The contest editors gave me a few minor revision notes. I revised. And then it was published.

It was one of those unusual circumstances where I felt like the story was largely given to me, where not very much changed from the first draft to the final version. You can call it a muse if you want, though I don’t believe in Greek goddesses. I’ll call it a blessing.

 

Image Credits: